TRF Forums
http://www.trf.org.uk/forum/

Index of current proposed TROs
http://www.trf.org.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=98&t=941
Page 8 of 8

Author:  trooney [ Tue Nov 06, 2012 1:06 am ]
Post subject:  WATER BREAK ITS NECK

POWYS IS PROPOSING CLOSURE OF THIS LANE , PLEASE OBJECT. Look at GLASS website legal for background to challenge , all info posted on home page of this site , objections in by 23 rd nov please ,very important !

Author:  Merlin42 [ Sun Apr 07, 2013 5:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Gap Road Powys

I’ve had a letter today from Powys CC. re U0549 the Gap Road, Breacon Beacons.(Prohibition of Driving)(Revocation)Order 201. It says, “The Committee decided to over rule the objections and make the revocation Order.”.

I’m a bit confused. Does this mean we can drive the Gap Road as the Prohibition as been revoked or we can’t we?

Merlin

Author:  KentWR [ Mon Sep 09, 2013 7:01 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Index of current proposed TROs

Just testing ...

Author:  mike Irving [ Tue Sep 10, 2013 12:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Index of current proposed TROs

testing what?

Author:  prelive [ Tue Oct 15, 2013 11:14 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Index of current proposed TROs

Leys Lane

Please object to the latest proposed TRO in the Peaks:

TRO docs here

we have until 5pm Friday 25 October.

Object here

Author:  Spod [ Mon Aug 10, 2015 2:12 pm ]
Post subject:  is it possible to turn a Restricted Byway back to a Byway

Question

Since Nerc collectivly turned all as yet unproccessed Rupps into Ristricted byways


Is there a mechanism in the legistration that allows for requesting that a restrictive byway be reclasified as a Byway (BOAT) ?
with TRO's as a means to close a byway (the permenant TRO effectivly turns it to a Restrictive byway

Im just wondering if there is a way to do this 1 lane at a time ?

seems odd that legaly it is a one way street with no legistration available to perform the opposite

maybe one of the rights of way officers could help me understand please

regards rob

Author:  manxman [ Thu Mar 10, 2016 9:55 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Index of current proposed TROs

U936 Dead Man's Hill, North West of Lofthouse, North Yorkshire. NYCC Proposed 18 month TRO starting 4 April 2016 - 3 October 2017. Order 2016 No 139

Attachments:
proposed-18-month-temporary-restriction-57186-3019042.pdf [21.26 KiB]
Downloaded 312 times

Author:  Doug [ Thu Mar 10, 2016 3:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Index of current proposed TROs

Dick

Really dissapointing. I put a call into the legal office at County Hallof this morning asking for some dialogue....awaiting a response.

Author:  manxman [ Sun Mar 20, 2016 11:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Index of current proposed TROs

"Mount Misery" 18 Month TTRO - 11 Jan 2016 to 7 Jul 2017

This road is in the Troutsdale area of North Yorkshire, east of Dalby forest, and west of Scarborough.

Attachments:
Mount Misery TTRO.pdf [58.42 KiB]
Downloaded 297 times

Author:  Crellin [ Thu Jun 09, 2016 11:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Index of current proposed TROs

AMESBURY WILTSHIRE = BYWAY 20 - VEHICLE ONLY TRO

http://www.wiltshire.gov.uk/council/consultations/troconsultations/troconsultaionbyway20amesbury.htm

Closing date for objection is 20th June 2016. Online objections can be made at the above link.

Seems WCC has let a housing estate be built next to the byway (which has now become an inconveneince), after a long sucession of "temporary" TROs on this lane.

The order is to "preserve the character" of this byway, which has a solid concrete surface for most of its length! Previously it was an access road between green fields, so ironically, its the housing estate thats the real cultpit in destroying the character of the lane!

Page 8 of 8 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/