| TRF Forums https://www.trf.org.uk/forum/ |
|
| Index of current proposed TROs https://www.trf.org.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=98&t=941 |
Page 4 of 8 |
| Author: | Steve Sharp [ Wed Sep 22, 2010 11:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Index of current proposed TROs |
Fingers crossed, hope it is successful! |
|
| Author: | back off road [ Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:03 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Index of current proposed TROs |
Just had an update from Peaks National Park and thought i'd post it here. It does say voluntary but please use ya head and do as they ask or they will no doubt close it. Staying on the Right Track Vehicles in the Countryside in the Peak District National Park Update – October 2010 Notice of Voluntary Restraint - Minninglow/Gallowgate Lane This update is to inform vehicle users of this restraint, which comes into force on the 1st November and ends on 31st May 2011. A copy of the site notice is attached with this edition of our newsletter. The restraint is in place to allow the unsurfaced lane time to recover over the winter period after repairs have been carried out at a local farmer’s expense. Landowners are involved and support this voluntary restraint order, which has been carried out and approved through the LARA process and with the help of the Peak and Derbyshire Vehicle User Group. We would be grateful if you could spread news of this restraint and if you have any questions obviously don’t hesitate to contact us (rightsofway@peakdistrict.gov.uk) or 01629 816296. The lane is shown on the map below by a black line. It lies in the south of the Peak District National Park between GR SK 197 576 to SK 222 565. please abide or it will be a tro followesd by closure D.C.C find this the easy escape route |
|
| Author: | angustoyou [ Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Index of current proposed TROs |
Where abouts is this? Google can't handle a grid reference. |
|
| Author: | Womble [ Sun Oct 10, 2010 11:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Index of current proposed TROs |
It should be between http://www.bdcc.co.uk/XMarksTheSpot.htm?g=SK197576 and http://www.bdcc.co.uk/XMarksTheSpot.htm?g=SK222565 |
|
| Author: | Richard Sugden [ Mon Oct 11, 2010 12:16 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Index of current proposed TROs |
Yep, thats the one. As stated above, please do comply with this request as failure to do so will inevitably undermine th ecredability of those TRF members in the area who are fighting so hard to preserve our rights in this wonderful part of the country. Cheers Richard |
|
| Author: | GW123 [ Mon Oct 11, 2010 7:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Index of current proposed TROs |
Richard Sugden wrote: Yep, thats the one. As stated above, please do comply with this request as failure to do so will inevitably undermine th ecredability of those TRF members in the area who are fighting so hard to preserve our rights in this wonderful part of the country. Cheers Richard Richard, Would it be standard practice for the local TRF group to contact the Peak Parks Authority and let them know that the restraint has been highlighted on the forum and that they support the voluntary restraint? Perhaps even getting a message out to the farmer/landowners wouldn't go a miss, Regards |
|
| Author: | Richard Sugden [ Tue Oct 12, 2010 12:54 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Index of current proposed TROs |
Yes it would and in this case i'm sure that will have been done. I know that this is the result of considerable negotiation between the authority and TRF/GLASS/PDVUG people. Your point about the landowner is a good one but that too should have been covered if this is a LARA voluntary restraint (agreement of th elandowner is one of the requirements). Cheers Richard |
|
| Author: | angustoyou [ Fri Oct 15, 2010 10:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Index of current proposed TROs |
Thanks for the URL Womble for the location. Much appreciated. |
|
| Author: | mudfacetony [ Fri Oct 29, 2010 8:55 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Index of current proposed TROs |
New TRO's - Slaley Forest, Northumberland All, there are now a number of TRO's in the Slaley Forest area. Northumbria TRF group members have been sent a map with the details. If anyone wants more info please pm me or email me - don't post up here as I don't use the forum much. in a nut shell, several lanes have TRO's banning 4 wheeled vehicles (including quads). In addition those lanes also have seasonal (end Sept to May) TRO's for motorcycles. The Shire road (which crosses Embley fell) has an 18 month experimental TRO on it banning all vehicles so effectively we have lost that completely unless ADK or myself can come up with a bright idea. Please respect the TRO's, they are correctly signed. Evidence of abuse of these TRO's WILL lead to further restriction. Details are on the council's web site. |
|
| Author: | back off road [ Sat Oct 30, 2010 9:59 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Index of current proposed TROs |
Just had an update from Peaks National Park and thought i'd post it here. It does say voluntary but please use ya head and do as they ask or they will no doubt close it. Staying on the Right Track Vehicles in the Countryside in the Peak District National Park Update – October 2010 Notice of Voluntary Restraint - Minninglow/Gallowgate Lane This update is to inform vehicle users of this restraint, which comes into force on the 1st November and ends on 31st May 2011. A copy of the site notice is attached with this edition of our newsletter. The restraint is in place to allow the unsurfaced lane time to recover over the winter period after repairs have been carried out at a local farmer’s expense. Landowners are involved and support this voluntary restraint order, which has been carried out and approved through the LARA process and with the help of the Peak and Derbyshire Vehicle User Group. We would be grateful if you could spread news of this restraint and if you have any questions obviously don’t hesitate to contact us (rightsofway@peakdistrict.gov.uk) or 01629 816296. The lane is shown on the map below by a black line. It lies in the south of the Peak District National Park between GR SK 197 576 to SK 222 565. |
|
| Page 4 of 8 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|