Act Now - TRO Byway 538 & 539 Objection Details
Update 4th December 2010 : Steve Sharp : Great news we generated 258 letters objecting, and Surrey CC Countryside Access Department have recommended that the local council drop the proposed TRO. Please click on the link below to see the report. The report will be presented to the local council on 8th December.
http://www.surreycc.gov.uk/legcom/Counc ... enDocument
Hi All,
Thanks Tim for your initial post, below is additional information. We finalised details at yesteredays TRF meeting.
I urge everyone to write a letter and object to the proposed TRO's, if we do not object in vast numbers the local council will implement the TRO.
Surrey County Council Countryside Access team have stated that the Byways do not meet the Surrey CC TRO Policy, and recommend that they should be repaired, vegetation is cut back and speed advisory signs are erected instead of a TRO. However, they were overuled by the local council, who are determined to TRO the Byways.
I have just loaded up PDF versions of the council documents and our TRF guidance sheet on to this post. See attachments.
Post below contains the Plans/Map of TRO's.
If you find it difficult to write a letter please just write a few words saying that you object, and state a few main reasons. We must generate as many objections as possible.
Do not hesitate to contact me for any advice, guidance, or to discuss any aspect of this.
Regards
Steve Sharp
Surrey TRF RoW Officer
PS Also available at Surrey TRF Forum
http://surreytrf.free-forums.org/act-no ... vt516.html
| Attachments: |
File comment: Objection details
Objections To Traffic Regulation Orders.pdf [15.78 KiB]
Downloaded 1565 times |
|
File comment: SCC covering letter
Cover letter.pdf [13.39 KiB]
Downloaded 1517 times |
|
File comment: SCC Reasons for TRO
538 _539 SoR.pdf [24.68 KiB]
Downloaded 1536 times |
|
File comment: TRF Guidance
BOAT 538 and 539 TRO_2nd Notification_bullet points for response_issue 1.pdf [55.17 KiB]
Downloaded 1549 times |
