TRF Forums https://www.trf.org.uk/forum/ |
|
Index of current proposed TROs https://www.trf.org.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=98&t=941 |
Page 1 of 8 |
Author: | admin [ Tue Nov 10, 2009 2:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | Index of current proposed TROs |
This thread lists proposals for TROs. If you are aware of a TRO that is not on the list please let us know by posting its details to the end of this thread. So we can create a summary it would be useful if you can include at least the following information:
Stonehenge Byway Area: Wiltshire Deadline for objections: 12th November 2009 Further info: http://www.trailbikemag.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=18846 Discussion (TRF members only): http://www.trf.org.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=86&t=915 |
Author: | prelive [ Thu Nov 19, 2009 2:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | Stonehenge Byway:Deadline 12th November 2009 |
Stonehenge Byway Area: Wiltshire Deadline for objections: 12th November 2009 Further info: http://www.trailbikemag.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=18846 Discussion (TRF members only): viewtopic.php?f=86&t=915 Poster's Notes/Comments (not discussion please) |
Author: | John [ Fri Nov 27, 2009 9:59 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Index of current proposed TROs |
Subject TRO: Extension to the closure of Monk's Trod Area: Powys Deadline for objections: Don't know Further info: http://emtrf.co.uk/download/monks_trod_ ... may_08.pdf http://emtrf.co.uk/download/monks_trod_extension.doc Discussion (TRF members only):N/A Comments: N/A Contact: N/A |
Author: | trfit [ Thu Dec 03, 2009 12:18 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Index of current proposed TROs |
Subject TRO: Gorbeck Road, Yorkshire Dales Area: Yorkshire Dales National Park Deadline for objections: Awaiting further information Further info: http://www.trf.org.uk/members-area/docu ... -2009.html Discussion (TRF members only):http://www.trf.org.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=86&t=1106&start=0 Comments: Contact: Yorkshire Groups of TRF |
Author: | Andrew [ Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Beggers Lane Surrey |
Subject TRO: Beggers Lane TRO Area:Surrey Deadline for objections: Unknown Further info: http://www.surreycc.gov.uk/sccwebsite/s ... endocument Discussion Comments: Surrey county council have had 2 x six month TRO's on this lane and now are intending to make it a perminant TRO for vehicals over 1.5 metres wide. Contact: |
Author: | Crellin [ Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | Stonehenge World Heritage Site Byways |
Stonehenge Byways Area: Wiltshire Deadline for objections: 15th February 2010 Further info: http://www.trailbikemag.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=18846 Discussion (TRF members only): viewtopic.php?f=86&t=915 Poster's Notes/Comments **IMPORTANT** If you have commented previously on the Planning Application run by Salisbury Planning Office (see previous post above), which included proposals to TRO the byways, to ensure your comments are included in this new consultation you need to re-submit your objections to WCC, details at the link below; http://www.wiltshire.gov.uk/council/con ... riving.htm Byways under threat; North of A303 - BOATs Amesbury 12 & Durrington 10. South of A303 - BOATs Bewick St. James11, Wilsford Cum Lake 1, Amesbury 11, Wilsford Cum Lake 2 & Woodford 16. |
Author: | trfit [ Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Index of current proposed TROs |
Gorbeck Road, North Yorkshire IMPORTANT ! A message from Andy Gerrard, our Chairman. Please note the comments and the importance of a big post bag. It is especially important that objections come in from local residents with no mention of affiliation to the TRF or whatever. Please ensure that locals move on this, If they do nothing then what hope have we for the rest of the country. Andy Gerrard TRF Chairman Message from Alan Kind at LARA Dear Colleague, YDNPA is plainly dead set on remaking a TRO on Gorbeck Road. This is now out for formal consultation. In this case it seems to me that a 'big postbag' would be valuable, particularly as you can be sure that the anti’s, will be scribbling en masse. It also needs a 'reasoned and detailed submission', and maybe one LARA Member Organisation could do that on behalf of all? http://www.trf.org.uk/members-area/docu ... c2009.html http://www.trf.org.uk/members-area/docu ... etter.html |
Author: | mick. [ Wed Jan 27, 2010 8:41 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Index of current proposed TROs |
trfit wrote: Gorbeck Road, North Yorkshire IMPORTANT ! A message from Andy Gerrard, our Chairman. Please note the comments and the importance of a big post bag. It is especially important that objections come in from local residents with no mention of affiliation to the TRF or whatever. Please ensure that locals move on this, If they do nothing then what hope have we for the rest of the country. Andy Gerrard TRF Chairman Message from Alan Kind at LARA Dear Colleague, YDNPA is plainly dead set on remaking a TRO on Gorbeck Road. This is now out for formal consultation. In this case it seems to me that a 'big postbag' would be valuable, particularly as you can be sure that the anti’s, will be scribbling en masse. It also needs a 'reasoned and detailed submission', and maybe one LARA Member Organisation could do that on behalf of all? http://www.trf.org.uk/members-area/docu ... c2009.html http://www.trf.org.uk/members-area/docu ... etter.html I'm getting a 403 error on both of those links |
Author: | prelive [ Wed Jan 27, 2010 8:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Index of current proposed TROs |
Quote: I'm getting a 403 error on both of those links ... because you're not logged in as a member and the file is in a members only area. I'm not sure that there is anything in them that is for members only, however one of them is addressed directly, personally to a member and it would be up to them to make it publicly available. |
Author: | Richard Sugden [ Thu Jan 28, 2010 1:28 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Index of current proposed TROs |
The personal addressed item is only a public consultation letter. I agree that the personal details and identifying info should be removed but surely the other info contained could be posted up? Also does no one else have a copy of this letter? Surely more than one person has been consulted? This info really needs to be in the public domain. How can people make sensible responses without the basic background info? Cheers Richard |
Page 1 of 8 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |