TRF Forums

This thread lists proposals for TROs.

If you are aware of a TRO that is not on the list please let us know by posting its details to the end of this thread. So we can create a summary it would be useful if you can include at least the following information:

• Create post title as area:deadline (e.g. Stonehenge Byway: Deadline 12th November)
• Description on the proposed TRO
• General area (e.g. county or region)
• The deadline by which objections must be received.
• The address or email to send objections to
• Link to further information
• Poster's Notes/Comments

Stonehenge Byway
Area: Wiltshire
Deadline for objections: 12th November 2009
Further info: http://www.trailbikemag.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=18846
Discussion (TRF members only): http://www.trf.org.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=86&t=915

Stonehenge Byway
Area: Wiltshire
Deadline for objections: 12th November 2009
Further info: http://www.trailbikemag.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=18846
Discussion (TRF members only): viewtopic.php?f=86&t=915
Poster's Notes/Comments (not discussion please)

Subject TRO: Extension to the closure of Monk's Trod

Area: Powys

Deadline for objections: Don't know

Further info:
http://emtrf.co.uk/download/monks_trod_ ... may_08.pdf
http://emtrf.co.uk/download/monks_trod_extension.doc

Discussion (TRF members only):N/A

Comments: N/A

Contact: N/A

Subject TRO: Gorbeck Road, Yorkshire Dales
Area: Yorkshire Dales National Park
Deadline for objections: Awaiting further information
Further info: http://www.trf.org.uk/members-area/docu ... -2009.html
Discussion (TRF members only):http://www.trf.org.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=86&t=1106&start=0
Comments:
Contact: Yorkshire Groups of TRF

Subject TRO: Beggers Lane TRO
Area:Surrey
Deadline for objections: Unknown
Further info: http://www.surreycc.gov.uk/sccwebsite/s ... endocument

Discussion
Comments: Surrey county council have had 2 x six month TRO's on this lane and now are intending to make it a perminant TRO for vehicals over 1.5 metres wide.
Contact:

Stonehenge Byways
Area: Wiltshire
Deadline for objections: 15th February 2010
Further info: http://www.trailbikemag.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=18846
Discussion (TRF members only): viewtopic.php?f=86&t=915
Poster's Notes/Comments

**IMPORTANT** If you have commented previously on the Planning Application run by Salisbury Planning Office (see previous post above), which included proposals to TRO the byways, to ensure your comments are included in this new consultation you need to re-submit your objections to WCC, details at the link below;

http://www.wiltshire.gov.uk/council/con ... riving.htm

Byways under threat;

North of A303 - BOATs Amesbury 12 & Durrington 10.
South of A303 - BOATs Bewick St. James11, Wilsford Cum Lake 1, Amesbury 11, Wilsford Cum Lake 2 & Woodford 16.

Gorbeck Road, North Yorkshire

IMPORTANT !



A message from Andy Gerrard, our Chairman.

Please note the comments and the importance of a big post bag.

It is especially important that objections come in from local residents with no mention of affiliation to the TRF or whatever.

Please ensure that locals move on this, If they do nothing then what hope have we for the rest of the country.

Andy Gerrard
TRF Chairman


Message from Alan Kind at LARA

Dear Colleague,

YDNPA is plainly dead set on remaking a TRO on Gorbeck Road.
This is now out for formal consultation.

In this case it seems to me that a 'big postbag' would be valuable, particularly as you can be sure that the anti’s, will be scribbling en masse.

It also needs a 'reasoned and detailed submission', and maybe one LARA Member Organisation could do that on behalf of all?

http://www.trf.org.uk/members-area/docu ... c2009.html

http://www.trf.org.uk/members-area/docu ... etter.html

I'm getting a 403 error on both of those links

... because you're not logged in as a member and the file is in a members only area.
I'm not sure that there is anything in them that is for members only, however one of them is addressed directly, personally to a member and it would be up to them to make it publicly available.

The personal addressed item is only a public consultation letter. I agree that the personal details and identifying info should be removed but surely the other info contained could be posted up?

Also does no one else have a copy of this letter? Surely more than one person has been consulted?

This info really needs to be in the public domain. How can people make sensible responses without the basic background info?

Cheers

Richard