I urge everyone to write a letter and object to the proposed TRO's, if we do not object in vast numbers the local council will implement the TRO.
Surrey County Council Countryside Access team have stated that the Byways do not meet the Surrey CC TRO Policy, and recommend that they should be repaired, vegetation is cut back and speed advisory signs are erected instead of a TRO. However, they were overuled by the local council, who are determined to TRO the Byways.
For some reason two threads were started in the TRF forum....I have uploaded all of the detail at:
Board index » Public Forum » TROs - Traffic Regulation Orders » Proposed TROs
Post subject: Re: TRO - West Horsley Byway 538 & 539 Objection Details
Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 12:22 am
If you open up my Guidance document it contains: address, email, reasons to object, guidance… everything in one document.
The link below will also take you to our Surrey TRF site which contains details..
here are two attachements:
One attachment contains all of the official council notification documents: Covering letter, maps, reasons for the TRO, how to object.
One attachment contains the facts, points and guidance, as to why they should not implement a TRO. This will help you write your letter and object to the TRO.
Available from:http://surreytrf.free-forums.org/act-no ... vt516.html
If you find it difficult to write a letter please just write a few words saying that you object, and state a few main reasons. We must generate as many objections as possible.
Do not hesitate to contact me for any advice, guidance, or to discuss any aspect of this.
Surrey TRF RoW Officer