Richard Sugden wrote:
Yes there is exageration and dishonesty in much of the antis reporting of the facts but not all of the problems are "percieved", some at least are objectively real.
Hi, Richard. It's just the chicken and egg bit that's wearing me down. The problems exist and won't go away until there's a copper standing at the entrance to every lane - that includes if there's ever a ban. The knobheads will just keep on keeping on. All I'm saying is we can bust a gut on all sorts of resources to help (and we do) but my priority would be to get the others to accept our legitimate rights without the sweetener of us having to be accountable for the knobheads. It's a no win if we go down that road. We're living in the post-Thatcher world of the non-existence of society - so we're all individuals now, this means that for every individual
anti there's an individual
problem which, if you put yourself up to solve, will be a never ending list of particular problems on a particular lane for particular people. This is reflected in the upsurge of minority pressure groups, albeit aided and abetted by GLEAM et al, and this is why they're being promoted and supported. Our greatest weakness is our willingness to beat ourselves up. I prefer the LAW which, I believe, is on our side whether someones got their individual issue or not. So let's start there and not be totally distracted by individual problems from tiny minorities or they're likely to distract us to death. That's all I'm saying.